Our product · Prawbot

No fictitious signatures.

Prawbot is a Polish AI platform for law firms and lawyers. He searches for jurisprudence, analyzes files, writes draft letters, and checks each quote in the database before giving it. The decision and signature are given by you.

Why not yet

Four reasons why AI did not enter to the office.

Each of them is real. Everyone blocks the implementation. Everyone can be solved.

01

Hallucinations and Errors

Generic AI makes up signatures, article numbers, and recipes. She gives them with full conviction, and when she really doesn't know, she just lies. In law, this disqualifies.

02

Data goes beyond your control

Questions go to someone else's infrastructure and models of external suppliers. Professional secrecy (Article 6 of the Law on the Bar) is compromised before you start working.

03

Safe means unintelligent

Polish AI systems that care about data are weak. They are simple search engines without understanding the context. Until now, you had to choose between security and intelligence.

04

4. High entry threshold

Good solutions are the enterprise world. Expensive subscriptions billed for each position. Solo law firms and smaller ensembles simply fall away.

Prawbot removes all four barriers at once.

Four pillars

Full Lawyer Workshop in one tool.

From the first question to the ready draft of the letter — each signature verified in the database before submission.

01 · In-depth research (rag)

Case description + questions = feedback in minutes.

You enter the facts and a list of questions. The rag engine searches Polish law collections (SN, TK, NSA, WSA, KIS, UODO, KNF, UOKiK) and prepares a study of 10–20 pages with conclusions and jurisprudence. Each signature is verified in the database before it appears on the screen.

Each signature confirmed in the database
PB Legal Opinion I'm checking the quotes
Analysis of the Facts
Searching for case law and statutes
Verification of reference numbers in the database
Editing opinions (10–20 pages)
✓ III CZP 45/15 ✓ Art. 471 of the Civil Code ✓ II CSK 293/16
02 · Working with a large set of files

You add entire files. You don't need to filter anything.

It accepts 50, 100 or 200+ files in one turn. He will read scans, handwritten notes and stamps, remember the whole thing and prepare a note with key findings.

Full memory of all material
PB Loading Case 214 files
Scans and handwriting read
Recognized stamps and dates
Building the memory of the whole case
Memorandum of Understanding
03 · Agentic Workflow

Agentic Workflow — automation of work on hundreds of files.

You design your own process that handles hundreds of documents on its own. The team of agents works in parallel, always under your supervision.

Scenario: 100 files → extraction of data → arranging → ready-made reports into topics.

Agents work in parallel, you decide
PB Flow · 100 documents pending
100 files · case file
EXTRACTION · IN PARALLEL
Clause extraction
Amounts and dates
Facts & Pages
↓
Grouping by topic + risk
↓
Check signatures
↓
★ Topic reports
04 · PISM generator

From the findings of the case to the draft of the pleading.

From the findings and evidence, a draft of the letter with embedded quotes is created. Verification and signature is always your decision.

Final quotes confirmed in the database
PB Project: lawsuit for payment generating
Designation of the pages and value of the item
Facts from the file
Justification with quotes
To be checked and signed
✓ art. 6 of the Civil Code ✓ Art. 481 of the Civil Code ✓ I CSK 27/14
6 work scenarios

You ask naturally. You get a specific source backed up.

JK
#1 · Jan Kowalski, Attorney at Law 2:32 p.m.
I added 180 pages of the file — summarize the case and build a timeline.
//
Prawbot 1.1 14:33 · 1,240 flow
Dispute over payment under the contract for the supply of goods. The supplier demands payment, the recipient raises defects and delay. WPS approx. PLN 184 thousand.
12.03.2023 conclusion of a supply contract
20.02.2024 delivery with quantity shortages
05.2024 late payment (45 days)
09.2024 debit memo for 18,400 PLN
11.2024 demand for payment
⚠ risk: limitation of the claim + allegation of set-off from the warranty
✓ extract· 180/180 files · timeline (5 events) · 2 risks
AW
#1 · r.pr. Anna Wójcik 07:00
I am preparing an appeal — look for decisions of the Supreme Court on the mitigation of a grossly excessive contractual penalty.
//
Prawbot 1.1 10:08 · 980 flow
Thesis: the court may reduce the contractual penalty on the basis of article 484 § 2 of the Civil Code, when it is grossly excessive.
IV CSK 181/07I CSK 748/12
✓ search_judgments· 12 results · top 93%
↓ framework of the argument · allegations, conclusions of evidence, legal basis
MN
#1 · Marek Nowak, Attorney at Law /
The customer asks about the risk — I pasted the facts and four questions.
//
Prawbot 1.1 16:00 · 3,410 cycles
The development of 10–20 pages · verification of each quotation takes place.
Verification of Citations 7/9
Article 471 of the Civil Code
Application contractual liability limited to...
aI answers are not legal advice · always verify
KZ
#1 · r.pr. Katarzyna Zając 09:00
Review this draft agreement (40 pages) for risks.
//
Prawbot 1.1 09:22 · 1 620 flow
Three risky clauses, two potentially abusive. Contractual penalty without an upper limit and termination without a period.
UOKiK's Register of Clauses
✓ search_uokik· 2 clauses matched
→ proposed counter-provisions
PL
#1 · Piotr Lis, Ph.D. (Agricultural Sciences) 13:05
The customer rents commercial premises and re-invoices utilities — what VAT rate?
//
Prawbot 1.1 13:06 · 1,150 flow
Same rate as rental service (23%) — utilities are a benefit related to the lease.
IBPP2/443-889/14/RSzILPP1/443-826/14-2/AW
✓ search_interpretations· 2 hits (KIS)
JK
#7 · Jan Kowalski, Attorney at Law 11:54
In which files will I find an annex changing the payment date?
//
Prawbot 1.1 11:54 · 540 flow
Appendix No. 2 — deadline extended from 14 to 30 days.
📄 aneks-2.pdf · page 147
✓ searched 312 documents· 1 hit
Signatures verified in the database
Who it's for

A tool for professionals,
not for internet cashiers.

It works best where the signature at each argument, confidentiality and Polish law count. We are also clear when we are not the right solution.

This one's for you!"

if you work under Polish law
  • You are driving law firm or legal department based on Polish law
  • You don't want to double verify aI results
  • Professional secrecy and confidentiality boundary condition
  • Do you want shorten the research and processing of hundreds of files from hours to minutes

this isn't nice for you

if you count on shortcuts instead of certainty
  • Need free advice as a consumer
  • Pending template to sign without reading
  • You accept AI, which from time to time confabulates
  • You don't plan to verify final results

Pay for consumption.
No subscription. .

To start, you get free credits, then you settle for actual consumption. The price always includes all functions, data on our equipment in Poland and one GDPR agreement with us.

Phase 2 · After
Pay-per-token

You are billed for actual consumption, not a penny more.

Input Tokens PLN 41 million
everything you send to the model
Answer Tokens PLN 1501 million
everything the model writes off

No subscription and no obligations.

It's time to make a decision

Problems in the law firm are not a matter of technology, but of processes

If these signals have shown you where time and margin are really leaking — we implement the transformation of work in the law firm: from research through file analysis to ready-made PISM projects.

Create an account
They trusted us

Frequently Asked Questions

Specifics instead of marketing. If there is something missing, write to kontakt@prawbot.pl.

↓How is Prawbot different from ChatGPT or Claude?
Generic AI does not have access to Polish case law databases and regulations, so when asked for a signature or an article, it often makes them up. Prawbot verifies each signature in a database of 3.9 million documents before providing it. In addition, the data does not go to the USA, but stays on our equipment in Poland. Details: Prawbot vs ChatGPT.
↓Does the data go to OpenAI or other providers?
No. The AI model stands on our GPU servers in Warsaw (OVHcloud). Questions, files and entire conversations do not leave Poland. It is a solution compatible with professional secrecy (Article 6 of the Law on the Bar) and the requirements of the GDPR for law firms.
↓How much does it cost in practice?
No subscription. You pay for actual consumption: PLN 4 for a million entry tokens (what you write) and PLN 150 for a million response tokens (what Prawbot generates). To start, you get PLN 100 of free credits after verifying the law firm to test on real work before any decision.
↓Where does the content of the law that Prawbot quotes come from?
14 sets of laws in one conversation: codes, laws, regulations, jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, CJEU, resolutions and interpretations. A total of 3.9 million documents and 744,000 judgments, indexed hybridly (semantics + BM25) with a ranking in Polish. Updated, not from the day of model training.
↓Does Prawbot work with a case that has 50+ files?
Yes, it is one of its key use cases. You can upload case files (PDF documents, contracts, correspondence), and Prawbot analyzes them together: it extracts clauses, checks signatures, builds a factual frame and remembers the context between conversations. You don't have to tell the story from scratch in every new session.
↓Who is Prawbot for and who isn't?
For: law firms and legal advisors (solo and team), legal departments in companies, notaries, tax advisors. Not for: private persons without professional qualifications (for them we have a separate variant Prawbot for you).
↓How to start?
You are creating an account at prawbot.pl, you undergo the verification of the law firm (you provide the registration number on the list of lawyers or advisors), you get PLN 100 free credits. No card, no obligation. You test on your own issues, you decide for yourself.